Showing posts with label Logic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Logic. Show all posts
Monday, April 20, 2015

Infant Baptism: Valid but irregular.

›
I've posted on Baptism, before. You can find that,  here.  I am a credo-baptist, however, unlike many Baptists, I do not think th...
Friday, December 26, 2014

Review: A Modern Exposition of the 1689 London Baptist Confession of Faith, Part 3: Of God and the Holy Trinity

›
To this point, I have interacted a great deal with Waldron's ideas on the confession. However, on this particular issue we have exte...
Thursday, August 28, 2014

Arguments that Young Earth Creationists should avoid.

›
The other day I posted about arguments against Young Earth Creationism that just do not work. You can find that post  here . I got two prim...
Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Arguments against Young Earth Creationism that just don't work...

›
Maybe you are reading this as an Young Earth Creationist, maybe not. I have no idea. What I do know is that even if you believe Young Earth...
Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Bart Ehrman made me a better apologist.

›
Bart Ehrman is very frustrating. He does, in my estimation, a poor job of realizing his own biases and presuppositions and therefore fails ...
Tuesday, August 19, 2014

KJV Only?

›
First, I would be remiss if I did not share this resource with you, since it is better than anything I could say on the subject: http://w...
Friday, August 1, 2014

Baptism and arguments that just don't work.

›
Introduction Infants or believers only? Should we immerse, pour, or sprinkle? These are often the debates at hand when this subject i...